In the midst of the medical school frenzy, several elementary school medical cla

According to President Yoon Suk Yeol, the minimum number of medical school students is set by 2,000. In other words, I want to increase the number by 5,000 to 10,000, but it's a multiple of 2,000, and I can't reduce the number any more... Anyway, I get it.

In the midst of the medical school frenzy, several elementary school medical classes have been opened in Gangnam. Why doesn't the Yoon Suk Yeol government crack down when this is illegal because it corresponds to prior learning? Why aren't they cracking down on the 2,000-member increase in the number of medical schools for fear of killing the atmosphere?

Some see the ban on prior learning as a problem from a liberal standpoint. It's a misconception that you should be free to learn and why you interfere. The ban on prior learning cannot be allowed from a liberal standpoint.

This is because prior learning violates ordinary children's right to learn. The principle is that liberalism limits freedom to the extent that it violates the rights of others. The prohibition of prior learning conforms to liberalism.

Then, how should we respond from a liberal standpoint? Precedent learning is prohibited, but the freedom of menstruation is recognized. If you have the ability, you should learn by menstruation. Then it's okay not to harm others.

In Korea, there are severe regulations and restrictions on menstruation, but in the United States and Europe, there are no restrictions on menstruation, so I understand that students can freely do it. You have the freedom of menstruation, so you can ban prior learning.

On the other hand, there were people who were concerned that if they allowed freedom of menstruation, everyone would menstruate, but if you menstruate, there is a high risk that your child will go wrong. menstruation can be considered only when you have the highest grade of 0.1% and an IQ of 150 or higher.

Strategically, menstruation is rather a loss for most students with normal abilities. How many children can enter college at such a young age when they enter college from the age of 14 to 16?

Even if I get in, will I be able to adapt well to my adult college students? Not early college entrance, but normal age of 18 (?), and you go to college? You learn everything in advance and repeat it for more than a year?

In the case of parents who overestimate their children, they feel sorry for them, but what can they do? Parents and children made the decision to overestimate their children, and they should be held responsible for the loss of their lives. That is liberalism.

conclusion.

1. It is a wrong policy to ban prior learning without the freedom of menstruation.  

2. Many academies and schools are openly engaged in prior learning, saying they will send students to medical schools. The government should crack down on teachers at such academies and schools and take administrative measures.