In line with Islamic Finance Sharia

In line with Islamic Finance Sharia
For products, Islamic finance, which recognizes the concept of profit but does not recognize interest in money, summarized the difference as follows (1999)

1. Money has no essential utility. Only to acquire services or goods
   You can use it, but the goods have essential utility. Let's exchange it
   can be used without
2. Money can't be different in quality. 100 won in face value is for all currencies
   It's 100% the same. It's the same with the passage of time. But a thousand dollars 20 years ago or a thousand dollars now are exchanged for the same value. But a commodity loses its value over time. (There was an economist who suggested introducing the concept twice.) Zilbio Gezel.. He said that if the value of a currency falls like a commodity over time, it can narrow the gap between the rich and the poor.
3. Money can only be specified in exchange transactions.

But the Islamic Bank
a real estate mortgage
a working loan
Allow all syndicate theory. But the way is a little different.

Basically, Murabaha Finance (Islamic Finance) is the three stages of investor bank customers, which have a mutual community with each other and thus share investments and profits. Perhaps it looks like stocks, but it's not this finance that reflects future values like stocks or moves from investors to the minute.
In fact, the stock market is a very funny, ridiculous market.
For example, Samsung Electronics has not changed anything from yesterday and today, but its stock price fluctuates and the morning and afternoon are different. That's why the stock market was actually created with the aim of raising funds, but it is not an exaggeration to say that it is actually a speculative market now. Islamic finance is not supposed to do this. There is a controversy over over the over-packaging (?) of Google's Gemini promotional video was manipulated (too much editing) and compared to MMLU benchmark's GPT-4, comparing the prompting technique, which can only be better, to Gemini.

I think it's to achieve the goal of presenting within this year, but I wonder what it would have been like to prepare a little more and postpone the presentation, and I don't know for some reason, but I wonder how urgent it must have been to this extent.

Anyway, I think I've never seen Google, the epitome of technology, in such a hurry to keep up with technology development. I don't know if it's true, but as we develop technology that will change the world completely, I hope we can create a better world through a competition in good faith.

On the other hand, Meta is showing its unrivaled appearance by choosing a completely different line focusing on open source. Meta's actions are also very impressive, so I'm looking forward to Meta's future actions as much as I'm looking forward to OpenAI.

Next year 2024 will be the year when the AI war will really begin in earnest, and I think it may be a more interesting year than this year.