2024. 1. 27. 01:09ㆍ정치이야기
When looking at foreign media, I think that the Financial Times should not be left out. Or maybe we should put it in the center. The Financial Times is catching the eyes of the New York Times, Bloomberg and WSJ. This is the European perspective, but at least not the U.S. perspective is the most important thing for us to look abroad.
The influential U.S. newspapers also have such clear directions that it is difficult to determine the validity of information unless filtering is done. Especially with regard to the international situation and politics. (There are still articles that are too absurd about overseas news.)
But there's one thing that's for sure. When it comes to economy and business news, having a high level of story competition, even though the analysis is different. A lot of times with valid stories. So surprisingly, the direction is similar.
In fact, it can be said that the business story is not that different, but the competition among those who want to tell a more valid story is real. Their feelings toward the tech industry, including Silicon Valley, are similar but different, and they all have slightly different views on Wall Street. As a result, interesting content is poured out as diverse eyes and many stories unfold.
There are much more stories in these "newspapers" than expected, and high-quality information and knowledge competition is always unfolding. Come to think of it, I think this is the power of them to endure and grow in the midst of this. In any case, the content they accumulate is difficult to follow and continues to develop.