Few people are good at saying that decisions should be made based on data.

Few people are good at saying that decisions should be made based on data.

Do Ministry of Education officials really collect data and use it for decision-making? They will say yes.
But, why do we always argue that we need to remove one or two units from math textbooks to reduce the amount of learning because we need to prevent the private education market from growing?
This time, the reason why they said they would not put advanced mathematics as an elective in the College Scholastic Ability Test is to prevent the private education market from growing, is that right?

After I started taking the College Scholastic Ability Test, I took out the matrix from math textbooks, the polarization equation, and everything. I added the matrix again because I needed to know linear algebra to know artificial intelligence. Why is the market getting bigger? I want to ask the Ministry of Education officials and people who shout about a world without worrying about private education. What are they going to say? They don't have any thoughts. They're just making arguments, not collecting data and analyzing the feasibility.

Why do high school seniors pay more for private education than high school seniors on average? Already preparing for college entrance exams? Because you decided to get first place in the national mock test?

No. Because students did not strengthen their skills by doing everything in the free school year until middle school, they got a score to pass the national mock test when they were in 10th grade, and ruined the midterm exam in April. This is because many school teachers transform the problems in the workbook containing a lot of difficult problems, and give a blow to the knowledge and image in the corner of the textbook, saying that they will not increase discrimination and create an equalizer.

Even though they register at the academy to learn, if their grades are not good in their first and second years of high school, they will challenge 100% of the CSAT, or some students drop out of school and prepare for the GED.

Does Minister Lee Ju-ho know this but say that deep mathematics should be excluded from the CSAT? It is like cutting off a wounded and inflamed arm when a much bigger, rotten leg needs to be cut.

There are math teachers in middle and high school who lead the organization called A World Without Worrying about Private Education. Why don't they look into statistical data and judge what's going on in the school field? Do they not or not?

In an interview with EBS News, the president of the Korean Water Association was right. There are many subjects to learn, namely artificial intelligence, machine learning, and so on. The curriculum was not the same as it was decades ago. I have argued for this, but I should change all undergraduate schools to a five-year system like architecture major, or a six-year system like medical school, and tell them to go to college to learn math and science that they did not learn in high school. Why are they sticking to the four-year system?

Why do prestigious universities in the U.S. select students who passed the math and science tests using the AP course? All students who have not studied calculus enter American universities and learn only well? First of all, prestigious universities have a low percentage of such students. And, since Americans have a strong body as a sport since they were young, they can study overnight while drinking coke and coffee, and sleep 48 hours after the test.

What about Korean college students? Students who were burned out in high school and studied to enter the school do not study hard when they come to college. I was told that the total amount of reports Stanford students submit in a semester is about 50 pages. I made them use about 16 pages while teaching liberal arts subjects, but they are going crazy because they have a lot of homework. I only ordered 1/3 of Stanford University. Probably, Seoul National University won't ask them to write and submit a 50-page report a semester.

If there is a lot to teach, but there are a lot of things that I didn't learn in high school, how will the class proceed? It's either one or the other.
They try to quickly progress one unit a week or slowly lay the groundwork like a supersonic plane flying away to teach all that knowledge, but teach much less than before. Then, do students study with their friends in group studies on their own? The reality is that there are many students who don't.

Especially in the science and engineering field, most of the subjects learned in the previous semester and the previous school year are prerequisite subjects, so can one learn a higher-level subject that is more difficult with only half of the subjects learned? I should have had a strong foundation when I was in middle and high school, but I can't, so whatever I put on top of it will collapse.

Why is it that Koreans learn Japanese much higher after six years, but English is lower than studying Japanese for the same period of six years? Under various conditions, some subjects take a long time to absorb and digest. Then, does physics correspond to Japanese or English for many students?

It takes a long time to absorb it, so you have to come across it for a longer time to learn it, but you rarely do it in high school, but you can go to university and learn mechanics and electromagnetism well from your second year?

Let's listen to an interview on each university's promotional YouTube channel targeting middle and high school students. There is something that the third and fourth graders of Seoul National University's electrical engineering department said. "I should have studied physics 2 hard when I was in high school, but I didn't and it was so hard." Even Seoul National University students. It has been in the newspaper for many years. There are a lot of engineering students at Seoul National University who can't follow the calculus and general physics classes. Even those who used to be among the top-ranked students in the country are having a hard time, but what about other university students.

Older generations of people who say that only science and engineering students can go to college to learn are those who did not major in science and engineering or went to college after learning science, math, physics, and chemistry in high school, but have not taught college students recently.

Interviews with current students show how much knowledge they have about subjects they have taken in high school but have not prepared for the CSAT. Physics 1 and 2 are taught in high school, and physics 1 is actually dealt with quantitatively. Physics studies up to the second grade of middle and high school do not make mathematical calculations. You have to take Physics 2 to perform calculations like calculations. Most schools do not offer Physics 2 under the pretext of not having many applicants.

figuratively speaking, I have a very poor lower body, so can I follow general physics when I come to college? The general physics test taken by most Korean universities is easier than the physics 2 test. However, the reality is that students sigh when they look at their answer sheets.

I hope you know the reality and talk about it. Can't only students who go to science and engineering go to college and learn? I hope you can come and learn and talk about it yourself. Can you follow me as well as I thought.