Why is there a fire?

* Questions of the 1999 Seeland fire disaster.

1. Why is there a fire?

What was officially revealed was a true story of mosquitoes, but what the bereaved families suspected was a short circuit.
Personally, I don't think the National Forensic Service is wrong if you choose one of the two.

The fire clearly started in room 301, not in a strict place like a hallway.
If everyone slept with the air conditioner on because it was hot, or if you and I had dozens of phone chargers plugged in, you wouldn't know,
It is unlikely that a short-circuit fire broke out in the room out of the blue even though he did not use electricity at night. Unless it was intentional terrorism.

Of course, it is a problem to paint containers and combustible insulation, but the facility itself was built very recently in 1998.
The fact that there is no room for the aging factor to intervene also negatively affects the leakage theory.

At that time, it was said that not only by the window, but also in the middle of the room, the kindergarten brought an additional mosquito scent and smoked it.
Mosquito scents are smaller and less flammable than candles... but conceptually, they are no different from cigarettes.
When the bereaved families experimented with a similar environment, they said that only the clothes were tanned and there was no fire..

It cannot be concluded that it is 100% the same environmental reproduction, and depending on the conditions, a lot of fires can occur just with mosquito repellent. If you search for past news articles, there are a lot of them. That's what I think.
Of course, it is true that at that time, the National Forensic Service did not properly explain, avoided responding, and dealt with conspiracy theories and doubts in a better way.

2. Where did the director and teachers of Room 314, who happened to be right opposite Room 301, do at that time?

There are no CCTVs and I can't prove it legally, but to be honest, these people were actually outside the building. =_=; The people were defensively mumbling in the mouth to be as little criticized as possible.
It's not that important whether they even had a dinner party with pork belly outside. It's a bigger mistake not to be with the kids at night.

3. On the second floor, there was only one person (Kim Hye-ji) who died after failing to get out of her room. Did she not escape at all?

Come to think of it, this is also very strange. It wasn't upper than the fire floor, it was lower than the fire floor. Everyone else around me escaped safely?

At her academy, she had to answer as defensively as possible, so she said, "We definitely woke up all the kids one by one and evacuated them. But in the midst of her hectic schedule, she must have gone back into the building to get her things." Naturally, the bereaved family protested that there was no way that our child could have gone into that red fire.

I'm at a loss as to judge, but unless she was sleeping in a corner completely, it's unlikely that the teachers or friends would have found her in the mess. There's a 70 percent chance that she woke her up and was in a hurry to evacuate, or a 30 percent chance that she actually went back in after the evacuation.

And finally..

4. The owner of the Sea Land building went bankrupt and went to work to compensate for civil damages even after his cell, and he didn't move to another area after plastic surgery and renaming..
How could anyone even think of setting up a botanical garden cafe on the same site and doing business with the same face and real name...? With what kind of business funds? What kind of human being did he do in the past?

Of course, criminal ex-convicts have to make ends meet after they are released, and their livelihoods are guaranteed. But that's not really moral..
I really don't think it's the guts and mentality of an average person. It must be a mystery that never lags behind 1 to 3 on the ㄲㄲㄲㄲㄲㄲㄲ.
Well, if the rumor has spread this much, it will not be a normal business in the future anyway.