Even if it is not a logical basis, there should be

1. If you look at the commonality of the argument that "Korea is not ruined by its demographic structure," there are only arguments and hopes, and there is no basis.
Even if it is not a logical basis, there should be hypothetical scenarios such as "inter-Korean reunification," "genetic discovery," "Naver's achievement of AGI," and "high-grade new drug development," but I have never seen such a case.
​
2. It is also difficult to agree on the arguments that "everyone thinks they are ruined by the population" and "if their views are focused, they are wrong." A small number of media, some speakers of X, talk about Shuka's brother or the theory of demographic crisis, and in reality, most people are in a hurry to make ends meet every day, but they do not feel what is happening and do not care much.
​
3. Was there a story of having a lot of children in the 60s and 70s and dying of the population? If the birth rate increases, the quality of life may decrease and become uncomfortable due to problems such as resources and the environment, but it does not fail. Rather, as baby boomers reach the main economic activity age, the scale and growth rate of GDP often increase.
Is Nigeria, which has a total fertility rate of nearly five, on the verge of collapse? Goldman Sachs predicts Nigeria will enter the 15th largest economy by 2050.
​
4. If the economy is not to be hit as the population declines, it is possible if the current demographic pyramid "remains in shape" and "shrinkens only in size" and "transforms the industrial structure into high added value."
However, in Korea, the number of elderly people is rapidly increasing, and the number of births and young people is rapidly decreasing. We have no idea what kind of hope we can find in this situation.
​
* It's just a rebuttal to the message, and it's not an attack on the messenger.