People keep mentioning the impeachment of President Park Geun Hye in 2016 regard

People keep mentioning the impeachment of President Park Geun Hye in 2016 regarding this situation. "I did this during the impeachment of Park Geun Hye..."

However, the Park Geun Hye impeachment and the current state of affairs are the same as the word "impeachment" and have nothing in common to compare. Actually, they are completely separate issues.

Impeachment of the Park Geun Hye was the process of determining what was illegal among the acts committed by the Park Geun Hye in his performance as president. In other words, the interpretation of behavior was at the center of the controversy, and it was a process of "politically" deciding how to judge it. That is why it took several months before the impeachment motion was filed. Because we have to judge. And we have to debate.

Therefore, there was a position of 'politics' in the impeachment of the Park Geun Hye. Regarding the conduct of the Park Geun Hye, will we see this as unconstitutional? How far can it be tolerated? It was a process of coordination between the ruling and opposition parties, so a process of discussion and inclusion was possible. This is because all I had to do was 'convincing' the interpretation of the Park Geun Hye's behavior.

However, the December 3 civil war has far exceeded that level. It is a definite fact that what Yoon Suk Yeol committed is a civil war and that it is a serious act of destroying the constitution that shakes the existence of a nation. There can be no such thing as a process of judgment. Even those who oppose impeachment do not deny that Yoon Suk Yeol's act is an anti-constitutional act of violence. No, he does not dare to deny it. If he does, he will be buried by the people and will never be able to pursue politics again.

They say that impeachment is chaos and orderly resignation. But choosing this logic, Yoon Suk Yeol's actions are too clear and deadly. Yoon Suk Yeol became a gunman in the president overnight. And everyone is in a state of anxiety about when that man might wield the knife again. Anxiety is not a matter of persuasion. It is the realm of "desperation" that a maniac must be subdued before he stabs him.

Any kind of attempt to delay the immediate punishment of the Yoon Suk Yeol is inevitably dismissed as 'incompetence' in this structure. It is not a matter of logic. Whatever logic you try to persuade with, it will not work in the square where distrust and fear of Yoon Seok-yeol dominated. Rather, it is regarded only as a selfish act of covering up the maniac and defrauding them of their own interests in the process. Isn't that part of the truth? It means a desire to 'delay' his resignation a little bit and create a more politically advantageous terrain in the meantime to run for the next presidential election.

Whatever your sincerity is, it is not a stage where it can already work. If you had hoped that this situation would not come, the ruling party should have properly controlled the Yoon Suk Yeol. There have been numerous warning signals, but each time, the ruling party has defended the Yoon Suk Yeol accurately as conspiracy theories, political maneuvering, and a quasi-movement of pro-North Korean leftists. The Yoon Suk Yeol only received and amplified them accurately and returned them to declare martial law "to save the country from the dark drugs of pro-North Korean leftists." Yoon Seok-yeol was the one who committed the rebellion, but it was the current government ruling party, conservative media, and *prosecutors* that laid the foundation for the rebellion.

People know the whole process because they are not stupid. What can be done now is to grab the Yoon Suk Yeol by the collar and pull it down faster than anyone else. The prosecution and police, who smell well, have already begun the work. They realized that putting the Yoon Suk Yeol in before the National Assembly was their only way to live. However, the ruling party, which still does not want to acknowledge the situation, still believes that a political compromise remains. He insists that no, it should remain. That is why he shouts for the Democratic Party's dominance and points out the crippling of the National Assembly.

However, most of them will not be eaten. As such, the impact of the martial law was too great. No matter what irrationality the Democratic Party pushes and what kind of force it uses to pursue impeachment, it will only backfire and strengthen the support of the Democratic Party. The ruling party is even creating an image of a fighter who resists injustice to Lee Jae-myung, who the party hates the most. Anyone who fights against the "absolute evil" named Yoon Seok-yeol can call him a fighter of justice. Furthermore, those who say it is a misdemeanor who is accused of 12 charges are willing to praise him as a fighter of justice.

That's why the government should bring down the Yoon Suk Yeol as soon as possible before it's too late. Of course, the ruling party cannot save it. The upcoming political scandal will be a rallying cry for the "power of the people" - I will officially call this the last name. But will there be no people left even if the party is disbanded? Just as there are people who will be ruined even if the country is ruined. If we want to survive as a people who will be ruined, we have no choice but to do it now.

If even he doesn't, he'll only be left as a headstone.