The reason why rice processed foods must be done.

* The reason why rice processed foods must be done.
(If you didn't think about this and made a rice consumption policy, you should reflect on yourself, agricultural officials, agricultural economists, and researchers.)

1. Thinking of it, I drew a value chain model of rice.
The top of the picture is the current rice distribution system..
Below is a system that will be made when distributed mainly by rice processed foods.

The rise in value occurs when qualitative changes occur.
The rate of increase is approximately tenfold.
The rate of increase caused by simple space movement, such as logistics and transportation, was doubled. In fact, in the market, this is an excessively high rate. I would say 1.2 times is high..

Anyway, after each value step, the rate of increase in added value was calculated until the rice reached the consumer, and now, no matter how hard you try, it can only increase the value by 8 times, but if you distribute it as processed rice food, you can create 800 times more added value than today.

2. If you've learned finance and economy, you know..
Let's replace rice with money in the picture...
The higher the turnover rate, the more value creation money creates.
It is not just an arithmetic series, it is also exponential. It is produced as a ratio of welfare.

This is a great discovery made by classical economists during the Industrial Revolution.

Things that can be equivalent to money. Those that can be barter can be replaced with money and substituted for the value-added increase model.
That's why I tried it with rice, and this is the result.
Rice produces added value as much as it is developed in several stages through changes in mass.
In the picture I posted, it was calculated that only manufacturers, logistics companies, and distributors were incorporated into this value chain system..
Depending on the role and advancement, finance, IT, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals, all industrial actors that make up modern civilization can participate.
In this way, the puff of value rises to a level that exceeds imagination.
Through the establishment of the value chain of the rice processing industry, the people included in the chain earn money and have a better life.

3. In other words, the economic development of the Republic of Korea has been achieved. This value chain model was created using raw materials imported from abroad.
Steel, machinery industry, cement, semiconductors. Isn't it all like that..
I'm going to spin it a little bit and try to do it with rice. Is that impossible?
Even if it seems impossible at first glance, if the state sets it as the top national goal and pursues it, isn't it necessary to do it?

The only way the primary agricultural product called rice can contribute to national economic development is to continuously transform its shape and quality so that it can be incorporated into more areas of value. That's the best way.

If you understand this chart..
The goal of agricultural politics in this era is...
Whatever happens, we must focus on creating rice materials and successfully creating processed foods to complete this value chain and circular model.

I've been to several symposiums on agricultural policy since the start of the business..
No one was talking about this.
Everyone only thinks about the leftover rice... Even how to divide the rice directly. This is the topic of the agricultural policy debate.
I don't go to those places after I see that. It's a waste of time.

And is this only possible if it's powder-mummy?
No, it's possible with the rice we're producing now.
It's a matter of will, ideas, methods, not of rice varieties at all.

4. In this situation, the more rice is produced, the better.
I was dumbfounded by the agricultural government that it would expel high-yielding varieties by controlling production, saying that rice remained.
If this value chain model works properly, it can get 800 times the value added. Why reduce it? What do you know to do that?

If there's something you have to do even if it's hard...
It's easy, but there's something you don't need to do.

Where are the priorities of our agricultural policy and rice industry policy?
It's hard, and it doesn't pay off. Does it solve the problem?

He said he got rid of the Borit Pass with the unified rice and made a green revolution..
The next green revolution does not necessarily have to be a goal of increasing agricultural production or solving hunger. If we lower prices and contribute to the development of the national economy with rice left over in the era of rice, what would be a more green revolution...