You promised to baptize me The pastor, who stared at me

You promised to baptize me
The pastor, who stared at me
But my series of "Studying Christian doctrine"
You must have read every time by hiding.
Well, this "study Christian doctrine" thing
Originally, I wanted to be baptized by the pastor
Isn't it used for the purpose of 'ceremony learning'.
You must have read it.
[Laughing out loud]

I couldn't even get my head up in the meantime
Like sneaking at your father-in-law's face
You're trying to search my doctrinal writings
I think you're courageous today
You even wrote a comment on my last post and submitted it...
It's a long development.
Ha ha ha ha.

You wrote a report and submitted it
How can you pretend not to know.
with all one's heart
I'll make a score sheet and give it back to you.

----------------

1.
Buddhism is also a 歸 of the three gods, or the three gods, not all three religions. That's why it is said that polytheistic doctrine is to go from three to one. Since it is a monotheistic religion, interpreting it as all three Buddhas is to respect Christian beliefs. It was not in the Bible 1,500 years ago, and there was a lot of controversy, but can we put God in the Trinity made by humans???
2.
What, in Buddhism, 1, 2, 3, 4~~ There are only 3 trinity compared to many?? Hahaha then aren't the 3 gods? Why are they all 2 or 3 or 4 after not a single god.
3.
報身 is the embodiment of the Buddha Dharma and the universalization of incarnation. It acts as an intermediary between the Buddha Dharma and incarnation. LOL. That's right. But what's different from the logic of the Trinity? The 3rd place is different from each other and is one, but the 3 gods of Buddhism and meaning are slightly different, but the structure is exactly the same.
4.
That's why the saying that the Trinity is a fake of Buddhism... Buddhism is much faster in timing...
5.
Hwashin Buddha Sakyamuni is a historical Buddha??? That's right.. Isn't Jesus a historical Jesus?? Just a fictitious creator?? Lol why do you have to do something that you can just read and study and make the trinity a fake Buddhist Buddha?? Lol
6.
The Buddha Dharma falls under the unchanging moon itself, the Hwashin Buddha specifically falls under the crescent moon, half moon, and full moon, and the Bosin Buddha is the moon reflected in the river??? ㅍ haha Don't search the Internet to study. I learned this sound like Pastor Kim, but one of them is...
No, when a half-moon rises in the sky, a half-moon shadow also rises in the river, so you mean that the incarnation is more essential than what you saw? lol
Rather, it is correct to say that the Dharma is the moon, the bodhisattva is the moonlight, and the incarnation is the shadow of the moon reflected in the river.
7.
The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are homogeneous and the same body??? Study the Trinity again... Well, it's one thing... But what about the Trinity??? Why do you skip saying that it is not the same and that it is a separate title?? In Buddhism, the three gods exist, but their qualitative contents come together as one, which is called the Three 歸. It's like the Trinity
8.
I'll just compare Buddhism and Christianity so please study ^^
The Word (logos) comes first in Buddhism. Logos is the reason for the Buddhism. This is the same with Idea in Plato's philosophy. Then, Bosingul (Nosana Buddha or Amitabha Buddha) is like Jesus, who came to this land as the God of the Father, and the incarnation Buddha Sakyamuni as the flesh. Painter changes, right? Jesus also came to this land after Logos changed to the flesh??
Shakyamuni is the incarnation of the Dharma Buddha... In Christian terms, he is the son of the Word (Rogos), the son of the Amitabha Buddha. Even so, even in the Gospel of John, Jesus says that the Word (Rogos) came as the flesh, not God, right? Hahaha, Jesus is the son of Logos, the son of God. This polytheistic dilemma has led to the Trinity debate.
9.
Buddhism opposed Atman and then returned to Atman??? Well, I once criticized it like that, so how good would it be for a Christian pastor to use it over his shoulder to curse other people's religion? lol. But the fundamental difference between Moa and Atman is a transformative or an immutable essence. Just because you're saying that there's no 'me'... Reinstall the basic concept again. There is 'me' but it's not the essence of the country. To put it in a hard way, 'I' is not the essence, but the 'attribute'. As the theory of Buddha-nature comes out in Buddhism, the question arises whether Buddha-nature is atman, but unlike Atman, Buddha-nature is not the essence of human beings, but the reason why it is 'attribute'.
10.
Of course, the difference between 'essence' and 'attribute' is not well distinguished for the pastor, right? lol
If you look at John 1:3 to 4
. 3 Everything has been created through him, and nothing has been created without him. Life has been created by him,
4 The life was the light of the people.
It comes out like that, right???
Do you think 'light' is the essence for a double person? Do you think it's an attribute???
For John, this light is the nature of Logos. However, in the Gospel of Doma, this is the essence of human beings. In Buddhism, the Buddha nature within human beings is regarded as the nature of Gros. Therefore, there is a difference in quality from Hinduism, which regards Atman as the essence. It is still selfless about the essence.
Buddhism is close to the Gospel of John. The Gospel of Doma is close to Hinduism. (Read the lines and memorize them)
12.
The Trinity is originally not in the Bible and is a proposition that humans later organized. In other words, if we think that the Nichea = Constantine creed is superior to the Bible, humans become satan demons with the verve that defines God. In the interpretation of the Bible, the Trinity is correct.
13.
Paul also sees Jesus as the power of God right now... Where do some shell-like Fathers blame Paul for the heretical sin of the Trinity? Jesus was sent by God even by Paul, and what killed and resurrected Jesus was all drawn by God's power. I feel sorry for Paul even for the concept of Logos
Ariusism, which was condemned heretical in the Trinity debate, is consistent with the most Paul theology.

Look at my writing and study hard. It's a good thing...
But brag about your knowledge