I'm developing it every weekend these days, and

I'm developing it every weekend these days, and I'm trying to change Kss to the name of Korean String processing Suite (or System) and put all the useful Korean processing logic into it to take it to the next level. It's a forced fitting of abbreviations, but it's not a very bad name, is it? 😊 When you think about preparing a kimbap restaurant franchise business, most people think of 'Gimbap with unusual ingredients and shapes' first. However, although it takes a long time to think and verify, the copy takes less than a day. If the new kimbap I made is for sale, the kimbap shop next door will sell kimbap with the same name in a day or two. Business ideas can easily have this much meaning.

Factors that are a little more difficult for competitors to copy may be changes in the way they make kimbap or provide kimbap. For example, if you select the ingredients for kimbap through a kiosk or application, a fully-automated kimbap cooking line will be operated, and kimbap consisting of only the ingredients you want will pop out. In addition, you can think of an unmanned or one-person store where additional pickled radish or soup is displayed next to you, or you can think of a store that produces it at a factory, freezes it, brings it to the store, and when an order comes in, you can think of a store that provides it through a microwave in the store.

You will be able to take the distinction a little longer than the previous attempt to differentiate the Gimbap menu. The reason is that the composition of the operation itself is very complicated even if others try to copy it, and there must be R&D for Gimbap cooking lines, frozen Gimbap manufacturing and defrosting, and testing measures to minimize the operation of personnel in the store. Customers also enjoy it or consume it conveniently, so there is room for commercialization to some extent because it means adding new value to Gimbap. However, the sustainable differentiation of such a business is not an easy story to tell. It may be a competitive business model, but it is possible to copy it in a few months and it is not easy to be ahead of competitors continuously.

The two elements, ingredients and shapes, cooking and serving are different, and they may be minor in the back end of the operation, such as selecting a place to purchase, procuring and pre-processing ingredients, processing and cooking, logistics, and streamlining store operations, but if you can give proper customer value by aligning all the factors that have a significant impact on unit prices and margins, then it will be more differentiated than the previous story.

Considering that gimbap is a fast and cheap snack, but it is difficult to yield in taste, even though it is sold in stores according to the original value of gimbap, it is about the price of gimbap at a convenience store, but it can greatly improve the quality and taste when eating, or that the ingredients are premium but similar to other competitors by minimizing variable costs such as labor costs, but the taste and quality are much better. It is easy to say, but it is not comparable to just thinking of ideas, and it is much more difficult than renewing the degree of store operation. In particular, it would be very distant for those who have not tried restaurants to maintain quality while minimizing costs through the operation of the back end, and to create a foundation to increase the number of stores by manualizing it. It would be to connect the ideas of the business to the essence of the business if the taste and price meet the customer's expectations in the same way as Yoshinoya Gyudongjip in Japan, and to proceed with an infinite process of painful optimization in the back end to realize the taste and price.

It is very difficult to create a sustainable differentiation and give new value to customers just by thinking about the business of gimbap restaurants that we know well. Of course, it will not be easy to come up with a business idea that achieves temporary success with individual creativity, but it is much more difficult to "realize" a simple idea when you say you want to run a business and to "continue to be ahead" of your competitors for at least a month or two. In addition, this way of thinking has to match the needs of the customer.

When preparing for a business or when the business is stagnant, you must have the ability and effort to come up with it. When you create a business, you must think about it enough to explain why you can get paid by customers and come to you without going to a competitor. It is just an idea to come up with a new product characteristic or way to sell it, and the start of a business is to come up with a way to realize it.

In addition to the morpheme analysis, sentence segmentation, and text summarization that were previously implemented, the following features will be added in the first release. Actually, I'm almost done making it, so I think the first version will be completed soon.

Jamo unit decomposition, Chinese character/Korean conversion, complete/non-completed classification, data augmentation, personal information anonymization, research recommendation, spelling correction, spacing correction, news data cleaning, Romanize, Hangulize, consonant/voice conversion, key words extraction

I think it's safe to say that the concept is Pororo's non-deep learning version, which was released on Kakao Brain three years ago, and Api is trying to change it in the same way as below, but many people are already using kss, so we're going to implement it properly considering the sub-compatible.

```
from kss import Kss

splitter = Kss(module="sentence_splitter")
output = splitter ("Hello.")

print(splitter.usage()) #Provides how to use it
```

The reason I'm writing this is to ask you a few questions.

(1) Would changing the library like this help others and be appropriate as a development direction for kss, or would it be better to develop it as another library altogether?

(2) In addition, I would appreciate it if you could actively leave comments if you wish this function exists or if you have any other good ideas.

(3) Is there anyone who wants to participate in the development as the main developer? (It's not a form of regular meetings, but you can develop it on the day you get pinched.)