It's scary because the U.S. is going up so much now.

📈 It's scary because the U.S. is going up so much now. Wall Street is now at a high point. There are a lot of people saying that... I think everyone's comment changed because they sold as much as their shares.

Key Issues: Gross Domestic Product (GDP)/Consumer Sentiment Index/New Unemployment Claims for Q4

Major indexes: Dow +0.00% / S&P 500 +0.06% / Nasdaq -0.03%

Sector performance: 11 of 11 sectors closed higher. Utilities led +2.79% higher. Technology slumps, +0.51% higher

Treasury yields: 10-year Treasury yields rise to 4.202%

CURRENCY: The U.S. dollar is up 0.11% at $104.40

Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin Up 1.93% To $7793; Ethereum Up 2.13% To $3576

Raw materials: Crude oil up 1.23% at $82.36 a barrel; gold up 0.68% at $2227 an ounce

"The leverage of some positions in one big fund starts to wane, the second fund hears it and tries to change positions, the third fund basically lets its guard down, and then the bigger and bigger momentum starts to unravel."
- Lacos-Buyas, JPMorgan chief global equity strategist




Let's consider the cost of the service.

Among those who do professional services (consulting, lectures, lawyers, freelancers, etc.), there are many people who say that their values and skills should be judged on a unit price. It's not wrong, but the relationship between the two is reversed. If I do well, I can get a lot of money, but I don't mean that I'm good because I get a lot of money.

For example, it would be natural if a customer's willingness to pay for the service or the market price formed by demand exceeding supply was set as a service cost.

People who sell videos less than two hours of YouTube through e-learning and PDF export files of documents printed in MS Word without correction, correction, editing, or design by any expert may think they are good at business.
But I want you to know that these behaviors are ultimately ladder kicks that reduce the credibility of the market as a whole and cause it to collapse.

To persuade customers by measuring the value of the change provided to them by presenting the added value to the market price, is the best prying strategy I think. So even if the same content is provided, 1:1 is different, targeting hundreds of people, and targeting management and new employees are inevitably different. Because the magnitude and effect of its influence are different. Even this cost should be reflected in consideration of the customer's will to pay, but it seems that many people these days think that it is the skill of sales to charge as much as possible for the quality.

The real experts I recognize around me are not the ones who charge the most in the field. They are the ones who change their customers positively and significantly. For them in the first place, cost is often not an important factor. But it's unfortunate that there seems to be a view of those people as if they were nave. Money is not everything in the world.