There are two kinds of people who constantly say

There are two kinds of people who constantly say no to impeachment. The first is "society suffers great damage" and the second is "Conservatives are destroyed and the party collapses." I heard that both are called "impeachment trauma." A baby's poop is also laughing.

It is not that impeachment causes damage to society, but that a person who deserves to be impeached is still working there. It must have reminded me of the winter of 2016 when the candlelight vigils and the Republic of Korea had a separate rally, but we didn't get that much damage to our society back then. The majority approved of impeachment, so what kind of damage would it cause? They are using clumsy measures.

If you don't like being impeached so much, the power of the ruling party, the people, can take the lead and step down. If you can't do that, what kind of emergency cabinet are you talking about? Who knows when you will strike martial law again without taking away your job? It's not like you know the people as fools.

It is surprising to think that it is logically convincing to parrot out the president's duties without impeachment, or to make him step down if he can't, and not to impeach him while he has neither the will nor the ability to achieve an alternative method.

The conservatives will be destroyed and the party will collapse?

Honestly, isn't he an alfano from the perspective of the public? I was astonished to see that a powerful official who participated in the impeachment motion said, "I thought I would be given a chance if I joined the impeachment." Participation in impeachment was something that a proper political party should do, and the subsequent loss of power was just a process that a political party that produced an impeached president had to be judged whether or not to participate in the impeachment process.

If that's the case, shouldn't it be deeply unfair that the opposition Democratic Party, which did nothing to be impeached, was replaced after five years?

The reason why it keeps happening is because nothing much happens even if you say that.

From now on, it is not something to end with words, and it is not something to end with elections. Let's give the presidential office and duties to the leader of the civil war. Does this make sense? Does it really make sense that the control of basic rights of the people is something that can be done? Our society is very generous with words and writings that seek to systematically destroy democracy.

As a result, we have become the world we are living in today where people say that we cannot impeach despite civil war. It must be different from now on.