Currently, illegal/unconstitutional martial law is a

Currently, illegal/unconstitutional martial law is a premise that it is said, but there is an opinion that it is not that simple to prove it legally, so it is for storage.

What the president can suggest on the grounds that declaring martial law was "remarkably difficult to perform administrative and judicial functions due to a national emergency."

Paralysis of administrative and judicial functions due to the reduction of essential budget necessary for the prevention of counterintelligence crimes and the fear of impeachment of judges

There is an opinion that even if it is judged that it is not a paralysis of administrative and judicial functions in the end, if it is considered that it is not possible, it may not be unconstitutional as an act of governance by the president.

Even if there were some conflicts, it would not be a problem if the resolution was made and the president followed

The invocation of martial law is the presidential authority described in the martial law law.

People ask, "Should it be illegal if anyone was killed or injured?" It's like saying that all men are potential sex offenders.

So, whether this martial law is illegal and unconstitutional will be a very sharp debate, and the Constitutional Court's precedent on this martial law is likely to remain a precedent on how far the president's ruling will be defined

It seems illegal to the general public, but it's not easy to legally question whether it's really illegal.