There may be people who sound plausible to

There may be people who sound plausible to argue that we should teach "creative theory" side by side like "evolution theory." So for those people, let's think about this.

There will be as many stories about the beginning of the world as the number of religions, or cultures, in this world. I'll sort it out as I can think of it.

Hinduism also has many founding myths, but perhaps the most impressive myth is that the gods created the universe by stirring up the sea of milk and making it tangled. If you add all the other myths, there will be equity issues, so let's just choose the milk myth that talks about food:

Nordic mythology was born because of the giant Imir and the cow Audumra in the beginning.

Greek mythology had chaos at the beginning, where the earth Gaia comes from and the world begins as Gaia gives birth to three giant brothers.

China is also a complex culture, so there are many creation stories, but the anti-Go myth is probably the most famous. We choose anti-Go mythology.

Japan says Iwajagi and Izanami brothers and sisters created the world.

The creation myth of our country is a bit unclear, but I remember the recent one was the Margot-Halmi myth. Let's choose this.

Other than that, there are so many stories of the creation of major countries, cultures, religions. Let's put them all together and include them in the "creative theory." Now let's say we teach this.

Now, where do we teach this? Do we teach it alongside the theory of evolution in science textbooks, as those who insist on teaching "creativity"? Stirring milk for a long time gets tangled, Iwazami and Iwajagi are siblings, but they have children, and Awadumra has licked salty black ice constantly, and I don't know if I can bring up a story or two about science if I do well.
But this is clear: if you teach it as science, you'll probably laugh at non-religious people, or even countless religious people.
Because it's like a self- caricature of "religious beliefs."

If you were to summarize the world's religion while teaching the humanities, no one would laugh at it. You can understand why the sound of "creationism" now is ridiculed if you think about what other founding myths would sound like if you claimed to be science.

If you have enough intelligence to think about that.