After the European Union parliamentary elections, it was said to be the era of c

After the European Union parliamentary elections, it was said to be the era of climate revisionism.

Looking at the upcoming U.S. presidential election, I feel that I really do. The fact that Trump said, "I like EVs" is a significant step forward.

The climate crisis has entered our lives deeper and has become inevitable.

Climate revisionism has been defined as a climate policy combined with its own economic and industrial interests, and more specifically, it can be seen as a climate policy combined with the interests of workers (workers and farmers) in traditional industries.

The emergence of climate revisionism may have been an inevitable process in the end because the real political system cannot cross borders and has a limited term of office every four to five years, despite the fact that the climate crisis is a common issue for people around the world and has a long-term impact. Even this depends on the political choices of countries with loud voices in the international community.

The climate crisis is difficult to persuade patients with a limited time, and even for workers at high risk of industrial accidents, it is a long way off. The same goes for the vulnerable. If we leave this problem unattended, climate policy may be hard to go further. The politics of the future will be somewhere between Hillbilly's song and the Sunrise Movement, and the fate of the planet will be somewhere between NZE and STEPS. (It's as obvious as a KOSPI forecast between 0 and 100,000.)

* In the IEA's outlook, the net zero emission 2050 scenario is called NZE, and the established policies scenario is called STEPS.