It has been 24 years since I became an agricultural reporter and observed the do

It has been 24 years since I became an agricultural reporter and observed the domestic livestock industry and agriculture industry. I have been raising livestock at home for a long time, and I have been observing the agricultural industry for more than 30 years, even the knowledge I gained by studying at an agricultural university.
Starting with various items in the livestock industry, he focused on agricultural distribution for four to five years, and there was a time when he observed and wrote his own articles on rice, which is the basis of agriculture.

When smart farms were talked about, they looked at smart farms by livestock type and item and accumulated concepts.

When I was in charge of the chicken industry, I also thought about the advancement of companies and capital led by Harim into agriculture.

Observing, contemplating, and rummaging through this and that gave me a lot of ideas. I think it was 2009 when such a potency burst. It was in the 9th year since I started working as an agricultural reporter in 2001.

I focused on reading from 2006 to 2012, but I couldn't read much because I was so distracted and slow to read, but I don't forget to read and listen to it once, which is my greatest strength, so the knowledge I gained by reading more than 100 books at that time is connected and fused like this, which is a great help in writing manuscripts.

In the 2010s, he established a processor to approach and solve problems while attending graduate schools, discussing, presenting, and doing assignments.

The numerous ideas that began in that way were organized through various articles, and several books were published in books. When a few books came out, several agricultural, livestock and industry magazines asked for manuscripts, and we were busy making our own magazines, but in many cases, we wrote five to six manuscripts a month.

In the meantime, it was rewarding to see that the reports, magazine manuscripts, and ideas that verbally explained them through various channels were becoming a policy in many places.
However, one day, I saw countless times that people who promoted this passed our 'farm and table' where they proposed ideas and used them as if they were their own ideas.

At the time of the revision of the integration law, I informed the late chairman Lee Hong-jae of the idea that a meaningful system would come out if the Fair Trade Commission's affiliation law was applied several times, and the idea was contained in the integration law after several public hearings that I did not know.

At the risk of being hated by livestock industry giants such as Harim Group and EZ Bio Group, he participated in a report on the entry of livestock into large corporations three times to set his own direction,

I went all the way to Jeollabuk-do to sit at the forum because there was a related debate, but there was a time when I saw the presenters and debaters of the topic, presenting based on our company's report and articles from farm to table, and discussing as if they had prepared it.

Talking about the retreat of the administration in the livestock sector, innovation in hiring and managing livestock public personnel (selecting livestock jobs by central administrative agencies, selecting various levels, including livestock and environmental animal welfare safety), innovation in the organization (transition to items of function-oriented livestock organizations, establishment of a livestock office by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry or establishment of a livestock quarantine office, which is a foreign agency, discussing ideas with Professor Kim Kwan-seok), innovation in livestock-related laws (transforming function-oriented laws into basic laws-item laws), and even people who shout that they have insisted on this before.

These ideas don't come out quickly, but why is the foreign livestock administration retreating? The officials of the livestock bureau closely examined the development process of the livestock industry, the structure of the past and the structure of the current livestock industry, and suggested alternatives through a logical approach. Those who want to pursue the idea skip the intermediate processor and talk about the conclusion, and I even saw the idea denigrate as a story of catching a floating cloud.
The process leading to the intermediate build-up (problem, cause of the problem, and measures to alleviate the problem) that has led to such a need is ignored, and if only the last conclusion is parroted like a parrot, it continues to do so, even though it is impossible to persuade others.

The government wants to ensure that there is no burden on the government because it will not be triggered even if discussions on the reorganization of the calf stabilizer on the Korean beef side are made, but it is a situation that cannot be worked out when it is argued that it should be invoked more often.

At a debate, calf stabilizers are not non-life insurance that gives money when the price of cattle falls, but are like performance guarantee insurance that makes the government preemptively act to stabilize the price of cattle because the government will also lose money when the price of cattle falls.

If the price of cattle falls, only farmers will lose money now, and the rest of the players, including the government and consumers, will be in a happy situation. He explained that this is a situation where the government and farmers are in different boats.
If there are holes or water in the boat, anyone in the same boat would try to solve the holes together, but as the calf stabilizer became nominal, they got on different boats, and when the boat of Korean beef farmers was leaking water, they watched the situation and said, "I'm sorry."

The government is happy that prices are stable, and consumers can consume beef cheaply. However, farmers repeatedly retaliate against the government and consumers by reducing cattle excessively due to imbalances that have not raised production costs.

The calf stabilizer creates an incentive for the government, cattle producers, and consumers to manage cattle prices not to fall too much or soar too much.

The calf stabilizer is not a management stabilization program for Korean beef farmers, but a program to prevent welfare of public officials.

If the government opposes the reform of the calf stabilization system due to concerns about excessive fiscal input, it will be a wonderful defense if the government responds that it is a law to prevent money from being spent in advance, not to inject funds when the price of cattle falls.



One way to work as a foreigner in the U.S. is to be a "quantitative" on Wall Street.

Quant simply refers to engineers who judge/analyze/predict/research/trade investment risks or investment opportunities in mathematical/statistics/arithmetic ways.

Since it is done in mathematics, it is possible even if it comes with a little English.  

To work as a Qant on Wall Street, graduating from STEM University alone is not a good chance, and you need to go to the Financial Engineering Program, well known as Qant, to get a master's degree.

If you major in space engineering in the U.S., you have to go back to Korea even if you do a postdoctoral program in the U.S., but if you major in something like Quant, you will have opportunities to work in Wall Street after a master's degree as a foreigner, and your salary is higher than that of space doctors.

This Qant math can also be used as a basis for artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) and can be applied to many places, including space, so it is good for one's future.
  
In fact, academic rankings should be considered to have no correct answer if you put it on your nose and put it on your nose, but especially Qant rankings should be viewed more specifically/personally/comprehensively. I think it would be good to refer to the following.  

These "living knowledge" are really important for people who want to study in the U.S. and find a job.  

-----

Master's ranking in financial engineering

1. Baruch College (CUNY)
2. Princeton
3. Carnegie Mellon
4. Berkeley, California
5. Columbia Engineering
6. Chicago (Univ of Chicago)
7. Cornell
8. New York University Courant
9. Columbia
10. MIT
11. NYU Tandon Engineering (NYU Tandon)
12. Georgia Tech
13. North Carolina State
14. California L.A. (UCLA)
15. Johns Hopkins
16. Univ of Washington
17. Rutgers
18. Illinois (Univ of Illinois)
19. 스티븐스 (Stevens Institute of Technology)
20. Minnesota (Univ of Minnesota)

https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/top-masters-in-financial-engineering-courses