The reason we read books is to steal other people's thoughts. You can steal othe

The reason we read books is to steal other people's thoughts. You can steal other people's thoughts through conversations with many people while drinking, but these situations are difficult to understand or steal systematically and often lead to disputes.

I'm still a big fan of neoliberal policies. However, in my recent book, they claim that they tried to change everything in our lives, not just economic theory, and that economic organizations that believe in it, money power, money power, and the apex, the president of politics. Seeing this whole system, I thought a lot about it. I don't think they just claimed this neoliberalism for their own benefit. It seems to have been their belief and their philosophy.

Reagan was at the pinnacle of neoliberalism. Although President Reagan of the United States knew nothing more than an actor-turned-president, he was a believer in neoliberalism and worked in related societies and networks, and became president as a result.

Among them, neoliberalism is basically about the abolition of regulations and regulations, so it has completely guaranteed freedom of the press. This freedom is not a good thing. Before that, there were regulations and regulations that must be observed as a broadcast. In other words, the New Deal created a rule that one position should not be supported and the opposite position should be broadcast. Reagan abolished it. As a result, Fox News emerged and represented the position of far-right conservatives, but the ratings were very high. As there was no regulation that only one argument should be made and the other argument should be shared, Fox News, which insisted only the far-right position, appeared. In the end, he did not report the objection. Guaranteeing freedom of speech, do as you please. This is what happened. To this end, seeing that the Minister of Justice and the Constitutional Court changed it by raising numerous lobbying and raising theoretical papers or arguments for raising issues, I thought it was very persistent.

As you know, Fox TV is still the epitome of conservatism.
However, it is questionable whether it is appropriate for a broadcaster to report only one side's position and not broadcast the other side's position.

YouTube's private broadcasting and public broadcasting are different.

In addition, radio waves were previously viewed as the property of the state, and all of these were handed over to individuals... and so on... and in the past, the New Deal government recognized and supported unions... and the government sided with the weak in the event of a union conflict..
Reagan is said to have fired all of the unions he supported during the presidential election when they went on strike. As a result, the union was afraid and the strike was reduced...

In this way, I learned that neoliberalism is not an economic logic, but a system of beliefs and philosophies that have influenced society and culture in general.

In the end, it is said that the bankruptcy of the bank has already led to the bankruptcy of savings banks by encouraging them to boldly invest in savings banks during the Reagan era.
In other words, banks, whatever you want... It's all up to you. It's all up to you. This philosophy was very strong for Reagan, a research institute that supports it and makes logic... The Heritage Foundation... Anyway, labs, chaebols, academic bureaucrats, etc. united into a network to create a philosophy of their beliefs.

Whether this is right or wrong is now up to judgment
It's not that they did it their way, but that their philosophical system was the belief in life.

Reagan was said to have the highest percentage of defense spending except for war at the time, and he also thought that he had more nuclear weapons than the Soviet Union and should be overpowered with weapons.

Anyway, it's a very interesting book...
In comparison with Korea... it's true.
It wasn't a matter of right or wrong, they were trying to carry out their beliefs and insisting on freedom in all sectors... deregulation..
Aside from whether this is the right direction

However, I was wondering if there is such a philosophy in the political situation in Korea right now. If you are a person who is united by a neoliberal philosophy
I wonder why they don't have free speech and want to seat someone they like... Is the Korea Communications Standards Commission and the Korea Communications Commission (KCC) really for free speech or do they want a trumpeter for their government... It's confusing.

Although I think their policy is in the wrong direction
They pushed ahead with the idea that the realization of the entrenched philosophy of neoliberalism developed humanity, and they were consistent, and they pushed forward with a logical basis for that..

Rather than moving with this philosophy, Korea right now
I can't get rid of the feeling of moving like this and that.