In the past, I used to have feelings of disrespect and contempt when I saw <Peop

In the past, I used to have feelings of disrespect and contempt when I saw <People with Short Thoughts>. However, I changed my mind.

1. Golf singles will be pathetic to see a man wield 100 stone. The difference in skills is the product of countless practices and experiences. So singles don't just ignore the 100 stone. Because I know the experience is different.

2. Should people who are good at computer games only blame those who are not good at computer games for being on their own? There may be some, but I admit the difference because I know that the difference in skills is largely the difference in time investment. Of course, there must be a natural difference in abilities. However, among ordinary people, the difference in skills is often determined by how much time they have invested.  

3. Looking at the scurrying of new lawyers and poor written documents, I think even though I sigh, "I can't help it, this is a problem that occurs naturally because the amount of training and experience are different."
ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ

Likewise, when I saw a person with a quirky and stupid idea on an issue, I studied a lot, read a lot, and invested countless hours in situational judgment and defense, so I quickly realized it. However, I came to think that it could be very difficult for that person.

There are, of course, real fools. However, much of it is often the difference in the accumulation of study and learning, experience and judgment by these fields.

Golf and games can be seen as the cause of the difference, but it is difficult to see it in the field of thought. However, time investment, like golf practice, can also be the key to the speed of thinking. Some people have a single golf speed, while others have a golf speed of 120 stone.