It is not easy to know myself. It requires constant

It is not easy to know myself. It requires constant thought, effort, and reading. Philosophically, what kind of tendency I have, what part I am interested in, I have to get to know myself through various life processes such as what kind of exercise I like, and where my energy source comes from. It is the hardest for me to know myself. Other people's comments are essential..

You need to know me well so that you can decide what to do and live your life. It's very late when you get older, and for young people, college entrance exams and employment are important, but you have to make an effort to get to know me for about 5 years. And after grasping yourself, it is desirable to determine a job or department within the company.
The reason why the 586 generation, who have lived the wave without thinking, have not been able to advise young people properly and are sometimes called kkondae is because they have grown up during the growth period, so they have little exploration of themselves (some people have a good grasp of themselves), and they have just left themselves to the flow of growth at work. A successful person is a person who coincidentally fits his or her talent and environment. It is not easy for an executive or a private business owner in a company to give the right advice because he or she is often caught up in the flow of growth rather than a job or business decision through consideration and reflection on himself.

In my case, I only get to know myself little by little now. If I had known this when I was young, I think I could live as a better (it doesn't mean economic) than I am now.
For example, I found out that I like solo sports. Solo sports are sports that go with people like hiking, golf, swimming, trekking, and so on. There are groups that go hiking with them, but this is my solo, not team work. Golf, swimming, tennis... If you look back, I like sports that I like, although many people move together. I have a foot volleyball meeting in the cathedral. I sometimes participate because I like people here, but it's not fun. If you look at the reason, I think it's the biggest reason that I'm bad at it, but I'm still good at golf despite my ball power of over 15 years. It's the Baekdol that is commonly said. But it's fun and I like it. But if you play a team game, soccer, or foot volleyball, the ball doesn't come to you if you're not good at it, and if you're not good at it, the ball doesn't come to you (because I'm afraid I'll make a mistake), so it's not very fun to go out. Eventually, I found out that I like sports like to go alone like hiking and come back after having a glass of soju with people I went with afterwards. This is my attribute and this attribute makes me realize that doing it is fun and talented.  If I had known this because I was young, I would have enjoyed my old age more by climbing a lot, swimming hard, and making a network with people while working hard because I was young.

I found this area of behavioral economics and psychology, which is more interesting and helpful to me than science and has no philosophy or sociology figures in liberal arts. Philosophy was rarely interested in me when I was young... by chance, philosophy books were so interesting. The reason is that while studying philosophy, I started to understand me and others better. He has this philosophy... That is, I don't know if he has that philosophy, but his words and actions show that philosophy and I hate that philosophy or concept, but... well, I understand. It's like this.
For example, freedom is the best option for a person who likes liberal philosophy. I don't want anyone to interfere or do this or that. In other words, community gatherings through discipline are a no-no style for me.
However, from a philosophical perspective, I think it would be similar to utilitarianism if someone who works devotedly in a community or circle, has a strong sense of responsibility and wants to lead the whole thing.  

Looking back, I'm not a person with a strong sense of responsibility in a community or circle. As a result, I'm a little bit strong in freedom. That freedom seems to have a tendency to like solo exercise. A solo exercise is a fight against me, but it's not a team work-oriented job because I play a role in the team.

When I look back on my company life, I don't think I was very good at this. I liked planning work, but I also liked making and persuading a plan for the first time, but when I do a project that implements the plan, I'm not a very good person. This is not a deep person, but a style that I know a lot about broadly and miscellaneous things. I think I made some creative plans with the freedom to think across fields and was recognized for that, and I think I played a good executive role in my company life. In fact, it was after the executive that my skills were recognized... The reason is that I was good at discovering new initiatives and making drafts without directly executing them. The managers and managers did the execution with Ian. So I always think there is no depth, and this is also the case with housework and friends. I envy and respect a friend who is always deeply thoughtful and considerate of others. Because I can't do that. I have often seen things that I feel sorry for are taken for granted to my friend. I'm sorry if I have to pick me up, I'm very sorry, and I'll take a taxi, but sometimes some friends will have to pick you up. Even if I drive 20-30 minutes more, I get surprised by the consideration when I see a friend like this. I also try to learn things like this. When I deal with things like this often because the environment is important, I sometimes see things naturally change like that. Essentially, I tend to dislike things like that. In other words, there is a lack of responsibility and consideration in the community or in the relationship of friends. But this is also my dna, so it takes some effort, but unless the environment is dominated - that is, I often see and learn things like this in the environment - I don't do this naturally.

The reason why I am telling this story is the abstract of what I want to say the most in a book that will be released soon. The process of getting to know oneself This process is learned through the process of skill in looking at me in various relationships for a period of 4-5 years. It is better to do it from college as much as possible, and even if you are an office worker, you need to think deeply about your career path and work after grasping yourself through this process.

It is clear that young people will work until they are 70 years old
I have to work for over 40 years.. maybe up to 80.
There may be people who say that they are happy not to work and play because they earn a lot of money. Is that really true? If you see someone like that, it's Dubu-ryu.
One of the mainstreamers is a person who eventually goes to pleasure and fails, such as drugs, lovers, gambling, etc
Another kind of person who enjoys it well

There may be people who think I can enjoy it well, but you have to take a good look at me in order to do so. Is my travel and relationships with others right for me, etc.. If someone who works in an organization and is the type of person who has to do something has a lot of money, he or she gets corrupted.

Why do so many retired fathers want to get jobs again?
It's not just about money....