It seems that there has never been a consensus

It seems that there has never been a consensus of jurists/lawyers on a matter as important as this martial law incident. It is natural for various opinions to come out as the interpretation of the law also involves value judgment, but this time it was a very clear and clear matter. For example, the Constitutional Court proposed a 'serious offense in duty' as a requirement for impeachment, but is there another offense as serious as the president himself declared unconstitutional/illegal martial law to enter the National Assembly? It is no exaggeration to say that this is the extreme of all the illegal acts that the president can do. However, in the meantime, there were very few who expressed opinions that could not be understood. Even so, he expected that the impeachment would be dismissed, not 'blind suppression of force'

There are very few people who expect the impeachment hearing to take a long time. You're welcome. The impeachment of the Roh Moo Hyun took two months and the impeachment of the Park Geun Hye took three months. The former was a relatively simple matter, and the latter was a matter of many issues and controversy over facts. Compared to the impeachment of the Park Geun Hye, the impeachment of the Yoon Suk Yeol is much simpler. First of all, it is not difficult to determine how serious the reason for impeachment is unconstitutional martial law, and it is not difficult to judge. There is also a lot of evidence. More investigations will be needed to prove criminal law, but there is no shortage of impeachment decisions right now. The most powerful witness is the people who have watched all these situations with their own eyes. The Constitutional Court also conducted hearings as quickly as possible on the two presidential impeachment cases, and of course, this time it will be. It does not take more than two months. Although the process of appointing a constitutional judge is a variable, I expect that a decision will be made before the end of February if the constitutional court is appointed within this year and nine members are appointed. Rather, there was a concern that the facts were not sufficiently investigated during the impeachment of the Park Geun Hye.

For your information, even Justice Ahn Chang-ho, the current chairman of the Human Rights Commission, gave a quoted opinion during the impeachment of the Park Geun Hye (though he made a supplementary opinion that did not fit the Constitutional Court's decision at all). However, one must not let one's guard down. Even after the impeachment motion was approved during the Park Geun Hye, the public did not let their guard down and took to the streets until the impeachment motion was finally decided, and the fervor led to the impeachment.