A daily report introducing "Madame Butterfly" as

A daily report introducing "Madame Butterfly" as an opera based on "Japan after World War II" by Jaco Puccini is spreading to the ground. Did the reporter not search for basic information.

But when I read the article, I suddenly thought of this. It seems like I turned Generative AI?

Usually, when you ask an open question to AI, there are cases where information is collected and organized at will in that way. In particular, there are quite a few cases in which foreign lives are taken and used arbitrarily without considering how they are called in Korea, but there are many cases where they are handled so skillfully that if you do not check the results separately after receiving the results, you will not know and then the results will come out in that way if they are not filtered properly.

Due to the nature of Generative AI, there are many cases where it is not possible to properly judge whether the information collected by them is T/F or not, and because they work more on the internal completeness of the results they write than the accuracy of the information, there are quite a few cases where the former is sacrificed for the latter. In fact, some argue that Generative AI does not speak 'language' for this reason. Shouldn't this be viewed as a work of 'calculating' based on the data learned, not 'thinking'.

It's a hassle to write an article about "Mrs. Butterfly" while checking the facts one by one, so I just wondered if he just asked AI to tell me about the opera Mrs. Butterfly. I asked the AI I use just in case, and he still corrected me until the end, saying, "It's Giacomo Puccini, not Giacomo Puccini," and "It's not the background after World War II, but the background around the late 19th century." But what if it's a free model? (Mansan)